How economical and reliable is the 2009 Honda Civic?
Just wondering how reliable and enjoyable to own a 2009 Honda Civic 1.4 would be. Have driven Mazdas, Toyotas and a Ford Focus - any comparisons?
Eamonn Connolly (Naas)May 2013 Filed under: choosing used car
Expert answer
Hi Eamonn,
Honda is justly famed for the reliability of its cars and you shouldn't experience any major problems. The paint on some Civics can be a bit on the thin side, which means that, where it wears, you can actually get a bit of surface rust appearing, which will need attention. Engine management system glitches can lead to a drained battery if the car is left sitting for a week or two as well. Other than that, there seem to be no other major issues.
Compared to a Focus, you'll find the ride and handling a touch flat-footed, as Honda went with a cheaper torsion bar rear suspension, but it should compare very favourably to a Mazda or Toyota - Hondas generally feel noticeably more 'premium' than either of those brands.
Hope that helps
How reliable is the Volkswagen Polo 1.0?
How reliable is the Volkswagen Polo 1.0-litre petrol? Cost running this basic car?
Erwin Meurs (Naas)May 2013 Filed under: reliability
Expert answer
Hi Erwin,
Ignition coil packs and excessive oil consumption on higher-mileage cars seem to be the only major faults, but then again basic Polos were so stingily equipped that there's nothing much to go wrong. Watch for engine wear though - it's an underpowered car and you need to rev the nuts off it to get any decent performance, with consequent wear and tear issues.
Keep it in town, at low speeds, where it was designed to work, and it should be cheap to run, with very cheap insurance too.
Is the 2010 Ford Kuga economical?
I'm looking in to buying a 2010 Ford Kuga. Is this an economical car?
Ronans Cullinan (Galway)Expert answer
Hi Ronan,
How reliable is the Chevrolet Aveo?
How reliable is the Chevrolet Aveo?
Shirley Campbell (Dublin)May 2013 Filed under: reliability
Expert answer
Hi Shirley,
Not massively. It’s OK, but in spite of being made in Korea, we wouldn’t recommend it, not least because Euro NCAP found it to be one of the most unsafe cars it’s ever crash-tested. If you want the best in reliability, buy Japanese…
How reliable would a 2008 Lexus IS 220d be?
How reliable would a 2008 Lexus IS 220d be?
Chris Keenahan (Tullamore)May 2013 Filed under: reliability
Expert answer
Hi Chris,
Very, very reliable. Lexus simply does not make unreliable cars, but obviously with a car coming up to its tenth birthday you’ll want to give it a good check-over, and don’t buy anything that doesn’t come with a full and complete service history.
How reliable is the 2010 Mitsubishi Pajero?
How reliable is the 2010 Mitsubishi Pajero automatic, especially for towing?
Mairead Waters (Bray)May 2013 Filed under: reliability
Expert answer
Hi Mairead,
Pajeros are exceptionally rugged and reliable cars, as Mitsubishis tend to be. It’s an excellent tow car, with a maximum braked towing weight of 3,500kg, but if you’re towing something that big, remember that you will need a BE category licence if the weight of the car and trailer combined is more than 3,500kg.
How reliable is the Renault Grand Scenic?
How reliable is the Renault Grand Scenic?
Wayne Mc Mahon (Limerick)May 2013 Filed under: reliability
Expert answer
Hi Wayne,
Depends on the age and on the condition. The 1.5 dCi diesel is a pretty solid engine (look for turbo problems though) and if a Scenic is properly cared for and serviced on the button, they can be fine. Beware of electric gremlins on older cars and don’t buy anything that doesn’t come with a full service history.
How does the older Toyota Avensis compare to the newer one?
Is the older model of the Toyota Avensis as reliable as the new one that came in 2003?
John Kelly (Limerick)May 2013 Filed under: choosing used car
Expert answer
Hi John,
Short answer? Yes. Utterly solid. The only recurring engine fault we can find with a 1997-2003 Avensis isn't even a fault, it's just a warning to make sure the cambelt has been changed on schedule and that's something you should do with any car.
A lumpy-feeling steering wheel means the column needs re-greasing. A juddering brake pedal means the discs need replacing. Um, that's it. One of the most solid cars ever, but just bear in mind that the age of the model and the fact that they're known to be tough probably means that any you are looking at will have had a lot of abuse. Watch out for builders using them as impromptu vans and the inevitable taxi and minicab use. Let us know if you find a good one though.
What's the 1981 Porsche 911 like?
1981 Porsche 911: good or bad?
Jimmy Adams (Wexford)May 2013 Filed under: classic cars
Expert answer
Hi Jimmy,
Good or bad? 911? Depends on your expectations, but the 1981 911 - the SC, which ran from 1978 to 1983 - was a fine example of Porsche’s iconic model. Losing the slightly prettier, slimmer bumpers of the 1960-70s cars a 1981 911 will feature the ‘impact’ bumper as part of Porsche’s homologation for USA production. They still look fabulous, though; indeed, after a period looking a bit sketchy the nicest, unmodified 911s of this vintage look great, slim hipped, and in the right colour with all the contrasting black rubber trim pieces and period Fuchs or cookie-cutter alloys they’re lovely. Personally, I’d avoid the whale tail look, many having been fitted with them after the fact, but it’s an easy replacement if it comes so specified.
Interiors are robust, if slightly austere, though the large glasshouse and slim pillars make it a fine driving environment. Gearboxes are fine, the 3.0-litre engine solid too, though like any car that’s over 30 years old they’ll need a bit more fettling than a modern car. Thankfully it’s all largely mechanical (rather than electrical), so it can be maintained by a competent home mechanic, though if you’ve bought a great condition, properly serviced car it’s best to keep it that way. Performance will feel brisk rather than outrageous if you’ve been used to modern performance cars, but then the immediacy of the responses, feedback through the wheel et.c will be on a different level to anything newer.
Perhaps not a daily driver, but as a weekend toy it’s a good choice, which if looked after should be worth everything you paid for it, and more in time. Rust shouldn’t be an issue, as all these cars are galvanised, but do check the inner front and and rear wings, and fore of the rear wheels, any potential water traps around the doors, windows and engine/bonnet lid locks, the battery box and under the carpets inside. Bad rust will point to poor accident repairs. Take a good look underneath for oil leaks from both the engine and gearbox. 1981 cars deliver 204hp. Do a bit of internet digging; it’s an enthusiast car so there’s lots of info out there. If in doubt speak to a club/specialist and take them along for a viewing - they may charge but it could save you in the long run... Jealous? A bit, the 3.0 SC is a lovely thing...
How reliable is the Toyota Previa?
2005 Toyota Previa 2.0 diesel. How reliable is this car?
Gerry Doran (Dublin)May 2013 Filed under: reliability
Expert answer
Hi Gerry,
This being a Toyota, you'll not be surprised to learn that there are, thankfully, very few major issues with the Previa. Really, the only engine checks you have to make are that the timing belt has been changed on schedule (every 60,000 miles) and the engine oxygen sensor is working right - if the engine management light stays on after you're started the car that's usually the sign of an issue.
On the inside check for floppy arm-rests. Seriously, apparently the adjustable arm-rests do wear out and refuse to stay in place, which must be annoying.
Underneath, rear track control arms on the suspension can be out of alignment (listen for knocking noises) and if you feel a juddering brake pedal you may need to budget for replacement discs. And apparently they eat tyres - big heavy cars tend to do that.
Hope that helps