I need a diesel car for big mileages...
Hey guys,
Iwant to change to a diesel estate car, but am not sure which type to get. I do drive a lot and need a car that is very fuel efficient with low mileage and low maintaining costs. Cars within my budget are either 2006 Ford Focus 1.8, Opel Astra 1.3/1.7 CDTi or Skoda Octavia 1.4 (with Volkswagen diesel engine) or Skoda Octavia 1.9. Which of these are the most fuel efficient/most efficient cars to maintain?
Thank you so much for your help and advice!
Best wishes, Cindy
Cindy Wagner (Waterford)Aug 2013 Filed under: diesel
Expert answer
Hi Cindy,
I would go for either the Skoda or the Opel. The Skoda 1.9 TDI is very economical (50mpg should be pretty easy) and Skodas are well built and reliable.
The only downside is that if it's pre-2008, it'll have a high rate of tax. That's something that the Opel with the 1.3 CDTi engine avoids, and it's still very economical, albeit slightly less so as you'll have to work the smaller engine a bit harder to keep up with the flow of traffic.
Which of these two Toyota Prius to buy?
Which Prius should I buy? I got two Toyota Prius offers recently. First one is 2005 with 67k miles for €6,000. Second is 2008 with 120k miles for €7,500. The 05 Prius has been looked after better than the 08 one. I am thinking go for the 08 one, but worry about the high mileage.
Could you offer me some advice please?
David Zhao (Dublin)Aug 2013 Filed under: choosing used car
Expert answer
Hi David,
If the 2005 one has been better looked after, then go for that one. Condition is always far more important than age or mileage, and given that there’s no mechanical difference between the two cars, you won’t benefit from the newer model if it’s been less well cared for.
What's the 2.0 TDIe Audi A6 like?
How does an Audi A6 Avant 2.0 TDI S line compare to a 2.0 TDIe S line?
Cormac Power (Dublin)Aug 2013 Filed under: choosing used car
Expert answer
Hi Cormac,
It will depend on the year and model you’re talking about, but if you mean the 2008 Audi A6 update, which was the first model with the TDIe engine, then it’s basically lightly tweaked for economy and emissions, but those will be nothing to write home about compared to more modern cars. The TDIe could manage 53mpg and 139g/km, but that was with the 140hp engine, so it’s a touch under-powered in the A6. You could be better off going for a more powerful 170hp version, which will have slightly higher emissions, but which will probably do better in economy terms in real-world driving - and far more satisfying to drive.
Should I replace my Merc with a Golf or Astra?
I have a 2007 1.8 petrol Mercedes-Benz E-Class with low mileage and my need for a big car has changed and I require something that will not depreciate as quick and will cost less to maintain and run. I'm thinking of a Golf or Astra. What do you think?
Michael O Neill (Arklow)Aug 2013 Filed under: choosing used car
Expert answer
Hi Michael,
I think your best bet then is to go for the Golf. As long as you are buying 2004 or newer (and I presume you're in the market for much newer than that), you'll be getting a car that feels barely, if any, less well made than your Merc, and as long as you go for a 1.6 or 1.9 TDI diesel, you'll have a compact hatch with the sort of performance, refinement and economy to mix it with even the best luxury cars. Depreciation? Well, everything depreciates but the Golf is perennially in demand so you shouldn't have any trouble shifting it on.
Volkswagen Polo, up! or Suzuki Swift?
Hi, following on from my previous question: he dealer claims to have no knowledge of previous history for the Volkswagen Polo apart from the fact that he can confirm the car has not been crashed, and he will give the car a comprehensive service.
I am also looking at a 2012 Volkswagen up! (move up!) with 14,000km on the clock and a 2011 Suzuki Swift GLX with 30,000 miles and a full service history. I prefer the Poloand its colour I am trading in a 2006 Volkswagen Sharan 1.8T with 85,000km on the clock. Dealers are offering me roughly €4,600 for mine What do you think?
Pat English (Waterford)Jul 2013 Filed under: choosing used car
Expert answer
Hi Pat,
The Polo's a fine car, no question. Practical and reliable, but your other two choices are, how shall I put this, a bit more interesting. The up! is one of the very best small cars to come along in a long time. It's nippy, agile and zippy, but still comfy on the motorway if you need to go long haul. The Swift is also a belter, a little short on rear legroom perhaps, but cracking good fun to drive and its reliability is off the scale good. The Polo's a safe choice, but I'd have a good long hard look at the other two before deciding. For what it's worth, if it were my money, I'd get the Swift.
Is the Ford Kuga suitable for an older driver?
Ford Kuga Zetec 2.0 TDCi 136 4x4. Year 2010. Price €20,995. Mileage 21,000. Is this a good car for a 75-year old man with arthritis? Currently has difficulty getting into his 1007 Volvo S40 (mileage 70,000). Any idea what he should pay for this car in exchange for Volvo?
Thank you for your help
Marietta Lyons (Ennis)Jul 2013 Filed under: choosing used car
Expert answer
Hi Marietta,
I wouldn't like to pronounce absolutely on whether the Kuga is suitable for an elderly driver with arthritis. Generally, Ford is very good at designing cars for elderly drivers, and was one of the first car companies to take limited joint mobility into account when designing the interior and access points. It would of course depend on which parts of the body your dad has the arthritis in, and how much it's restricting his mobility. I wouldn't be medically qualified to pass judgement on that.
Off the top of my head though, I would suggest that the Kuga might actually be a bit too tall, and require an up-and-in motion that may not be any easier than the down-and-in of the S40. I would have throught that a Ford C-Max, which is more between the heights of the Focus and the Kuga, would be a better bet. Easier to slide straight into. Worth a look anyway.
If you're trading in the S40, I'd reckon you should be getting offers of around €9,000 to €10,000, depending on the condition, history and which engine it's got.
Come back to us if you need more help.
Are Renault Grand Espaces reliable cars?
Are Renault Grand Espaces reliable cars?
Kevin Barry (Cork)Jul 2013 Filed under: reliability
Expert answer
Hi Kevin,
Not great I'm afraid. The current Espace, which dates back to 2003, is based on the same platform as the second generation Laguna and suffers the same problems. So expect lots of electrical issues (not great on a car with an all-digital dashboard) and the electric windows are especially fragile. Front tyre wear is also an issue, and we've heard reports of collapsing front suspension and a tendency for the exhaust system to give problems, especially with the catalytic convertor.
What do you think of the BMW 3 Series GT?
Can you give me your comments and opinions on the BMW 3 Series GT diesel automatic?
Patrick Rice (Greystones)Jul 2013 Filed under: choosing new car
Expert answer
Hi Patrick,
I've just recently driven the BMW 318d GT with an automatic gearbox in Irish specification (Luxury to be exact) on Irish roads and it's a fabulously comfortable car. It feels (and is) hugely spacious inside and in the boot too. Surprisingly, it's quite different to drive and in character to both the 3 Series saloon and Touring estate. It's even more comfortable on the road and more refined. However, if you're coming from one of those cars and you like how they drive you may not appreciate the reduced 'sharpness' in the dynamics. Most people won't care though and they'll relish the comfort.
The 318d engine seems to cope well enough with the car's weight and the eight-speed automatic transmission is a gem.
Which version are you considering?
How reliable is the 2004 Renault Clio?
How reliable is the 2004 Renault Clio?
Mark Nolan (Dublin )Jul 2013 Filed under: reliability
Expert answer
Hi Mark,
The most common fault with that generation Clio was with the bonnet catch that could fail and allow the bonnet to fly open when driving! Worrying that, and it never triggered a full recall, although Renault did offer to inspect and repair cars for free - make sure the one you're looking at has had that done. Engines are pretty solid, but watch for electrical issues with the windows, the CD player and the engine immobiliser. There are reports of cold starting problems, usually because of a faulty air pressure sensor and the cable-operated gear shift can give problems too. If you have difficulty selecting a gear, then the gearbox is on its way out. Cabin trim is pretty fragile and you need to watch for problems with the brake servos and front suspension arms.
What's the Chrysler 300C like?
Any faults with Chrysler's 300C? I'm looking at a 2008 model with 30,000 miles on the clock. What should I look for? It's the SRT Design version.
Jack Boyle (Dublin)Jul 2013 Filed under: reliability
Expert answer
Hi Jack,
Actually, the 300C is really well built. The European market cars were built under licence in Austria and under the skin it's essentially a 1996 Mercedes-Benz E-Class, so all the components are rock-solid, especially the 3.0-litre diesel engine. Where you need to be careful is in making sure it's been looked after. There are a lot of complicated electronic bits and you need to see a full service history with a car like this, as neglect will lead to problems very quickly. If there's no, or patchy, history, walk away. Also, a good few 300Cs saw service as taxis so beware of abused and damaged interiors or knackered suspension.
