Expert answer

Hi Sinead,

To be honest, I'd avoid it. The 307 was never a great car to begin with and it was probably one of the lowest points for Peugeot build quality. They tend to suffer every electrical problem going, the cabins and interiors are very fragile and the suspension is prone to outright failure. 

If you still fancy a Peugeot, see if you can stretch your budget to a 308 - that was a much better built car, has decent reliability and if you get the 1.6 diesel then 65mpg in daily driving is a reality for you.

Expert answer

Hi Rory,

Full service history? Then you could be looking at around the €7,500 mark. Not a full history? Then probably more like €6,000.

Expert answer

Hi Tom,

How about a Fiat Multipla? OK, not everyone's idea of a good looking car, but it's got an amazing interior, bags of space, is terrific to drive and I found one for €4,500. Yes, I know... OK, on with the sensible stuff though.

There are plenty of Opel Zafiras around for that kind of money, but you will have to search hard to find a diesel one. They are out there though. Plenty of Peugeot 307 SW estates (which came with a seven-seat option) too, but tread carefully and make sure there are no electrical gremlins to deal with. Ditto Renault Scenics. Actually, the more ruggedly reliable Kangoo (or a Citroen Berlingo for that matter) might be a better option.

The most sensible suggestion would be a Toyota Corolla Verso, but they're very, very hard to find with a diesel engine at that price level. Might be worth biting the bullet and going for petrol to get the best.

Expert answer

Hi John,

There are two schools of, quite influential, official thought on this. If you consult reliability expert JD Power, which conducts an annual vehicle reliability and customer satisfaction survey, the 206 is pretty dreadful. JD Power rates its reliability as below average, with poor interior quality, and it regularly finishes in the bottom ten of vehicles surveyed.

Over at Warranty Direct though, which independently insures vehicles against mechanical failure as part of its aftermarket warranty products, the picture is a little rosier. WD rates the 206's reliability as good, and certainly ahead of most of its French rivals. Problems tend to stem from the electrical system, and most of the time they're pretty cheap to fix.

To be honest though, in general, if you're looking at an older French car, you're looking at trouble.

Expert answer

Hi Sean,

Go for the 1.6. It's more economical, has lower emissions and is more common than the 1.8, so parts and bits are easier to come by if anything goes wrong. Now, watch the turbo like a hawk, the exhaust gas recirculation valve can give trouble and make sure you insist on proper, high-quality synthetic oil whenever it's serviced. The older 1.8 is actually a bit of a cracking engine, and an in-house Ford designed unit, not shared with other brands as the 1.6 is (Peugeot, Citroen, Volvo and MINI have all shared the same engine). It's a good unit, but the easier running costs of the 1.6 just make it the better choice.

Expert answer

Hi Ian,

As discussed with you offline, we talked to Peugeot Ireland about this, and the contact there spoke with the dealer in question. The dealer response was:

• The customer booked a two-year service, which would include an air conditioning inspection
• There was no defect detected with the air con (thus no warranty coverage needed)
• The technician used his air con machine to check that there was no leak present in the system - there wasn't
• There was a gas top-up needed, which the customer was charged for

 Peugeot then commented: "We would like to offer the following explanation to the customer - even if an air con system isn't used, if a customer uses the front window demister they do inadvertently use the air con system, which over time would use up gas. I hope this helps. Should the customer wish to have contact with our Customer Services department, I can arrange a call to them."

Hopefully that's helped you understand the situation to your satisfaction, but you know where we are if you need us again.

Expert answer

Hi Elizabeth,

The short answer is the Qashqai. Both the Nissans will be more reliable than the Peugeot (certainly according to the respective JD Power ratings of those brands) even if Peugeot's quality and reliability levels have dramatically improved in recent years. The Juke is a smaller, niche-ier vehicle than the Qashqai, which has been ragingly popular since it was launched, and lives smack in the middle of the ever-popular family car market, so it's the bigger Nissan that will hold its value the best.

Expert answer

Hi Lizzy,

Well, for a start, you're looking at two different segments here. The 3008 and Qashqai are much larger than the Juke, which is really quite a small car, especially on the inside. So, if you're regularly carrying large people or large loads, then I'd cross that one off your list. It's a little hard to say exactly how reliable any car is, but a good indicator is the result of the JD Power customer satisfaction survey. The most recent one, done in the UK last year, showed that Nissan was in the top ten for reliability and satisfaction while Peugeot finished in the bottom four.

Take from that what you will.

Expert answer

Hi Barry,

To be blunt, you're going to struggle to get a decent diesel engined car at that price level. There do seem to be one or two diesel Peugeot 307s or Renault Méganes around at that sort of money but we'd advise serious caution before purchase - neither have a great reputation for reliability. 

Unless you're covering mega-miles every week, you would probably be much, much better off getting a tidy 1.4 petrol hatchback, perhaps a circa 2002 Toyota Corolla? Really solid on the reliability front, excellent fuel economy and affordable motor tax. It would be a much better idea than going all out for diesel but ending up with a less reliable car.

What do you think?

Expert answer

Hi Mary,

In an independent garage we'd expect a price of €80 labour with parts on top of that.