Expert answer

Hi Vittorio,

You've got it all answered yourself there. The BMW's overall residual value will indeed be slightly better, but, long term, the Mazda should prove to be much more reliable and rugged. Both are excellent to drive. The BMW's classic rear-drive chassis is slightly the superior, but the Mazda's muscular steering feel and firmly sprung chassis makes it one of the best front-drive saloon chassis around. 

Nothing major to watch for on either - just make sure there's a fully stamped up service history and check the BMW carefully to make sure that all the electrical bits work and that it's been topped up with high grade oil at each service. Both cars may have been driven hard by previous owners (many will be ex-fleet) so check carefully for thinks like uneven tyre wear or noises from underneath that indicate worn or out-askew suspension.

Let us know how you get on

Expert answer

Hi Susan,

Nothing at all really, and if you're picking a Micra then you should be on a winner, reliability-wise. Fleet cars are often a better bet than private cars simply because their service history should be full and all major maintenance done on time and schedule. Will it have had a harder life than a private car? Possibly, but just have a careful check over for signs of excess wear and tear and if you're concerned, walk away; plenty more out there.

Let us know how you get on

Expert answer

Hi Eddie,

There are certainly no reports out there of any persistent handbrake issues with the FR-V so it could just be a specific problem with that car - the handbrake may have been over-adjusted at the last service, perhaps. Try another one and see if you feel the same problem. Otherwise FR-Vs are, like all Hondas, staggeringly reliable and well made. There are just no repeated problems with them, so, as long as the one you're looking at has a full service history and is in good nick, you should be fine.

Just watch for two things; check the interior and especially the boot for signs of excess wear and tear - these are hard-working family machines and many have been treated with a fair amount of disdain. Then check the tyres for signs of uneven wear - that could mean that the suspension has been knocked askew, something that's easily done as the FR-V is a little wider than most cars.

Hope that helps

Expert answer

Hi Vittorio,

Oooh. Aargh. Ummm. God, this is actually a real toughie as I utterly adore both cars and they're both ideal picks. 

OK, I'll lay out the pros and cons and you'll have to make your own mind up from there.

The Octavia will likely prove to be the more reliable in the long term and is much more spacious and practical than the Beemer. The 320d, by contrast, is much sweeter to drive thanks to all the usual BMW rear-drive balance and it does have a nicer interior. 

To be honest though, I'd grab either with both hands and not let go. See which one you can find that's in better condition or is better value.

Let us know what you decide

Expert answer

Hi Gerard,

It’s a very good family car from the point of view of safety and comfort, and yes that 1.5-litre diesel is hugely economical (you should see better than 50mpg on a regular basis). You just need to keep a close eye on electrical items such as the central locking, the key-card and the windows and beware of traditionally steep depreciation for large French cars.

Expert answer

Hi Gabriel,

Dacias are fine, to be honest, you just have to make sure you know what you're getting into. They're not sophisticated, nor are they especially modern, but they're cheap and genuinely quite cheerful. Best of the bunch is the Sandero supermini, which combines decent build quality with surprising refinement and a  emptingly low price.

The Duster SUV is also pretty good, albeit it's quite an old design now and lacks things like electronic stability control as standard. Still, it's rugged, tough and refreshingly simple. The newer Logan estate and Stepway crossover are just variations on the Sandero theme and are there for those who need either an enormous boot (Logan) or a bit of 4x4-esque style (Stepway).

Expert answer

Hi Katy,

Expert answer

Hi Noel,

We can’t tell you if a particular car is worth buying or not, but we do like our Jags and the 2003 onwards XJ was a very nice one. Common problems include broken door handles, leaking boot seals, a rattling from the engine caused by faulty tappets, broken ABS sensors, knocking suspension meaning the dampers are shot, leaking dampers, failed air suspension pumps and basically anything electrical.

While the XJ was always well made and reliable, you’ve got to remember that they’re hugely complex cars and need to be cared for properly to remain reliable. If there are any gaps in the service history, or the car seems tired or worn out, then walk away.

Expert answer

Hi David,

That's a little strange. The only tax band that costs €330 per year is the 1,101- to 1,200cc range for pre-2008 cars. Could your car have been classified incorrectly? 

Expert answer

Hi Jimmy,

Really good car - no surprise it's one of the top-selling SUVs. Much better to drive than is the norm for such cars and with decent economy too. No major reliability scares either, just make sure that the recall that saw 800,000 Tiguans worldwide brought back in last year to have a headlight fuse issue fix has been completed. Oh, and the boot is a little on the small side for a car this size, but otherwise it's a good 'un.